What open‑source licenses work best for badge firmware and hardware files?
What Open‑Source Licenses Work Best for Badge Firmware and Hardware Files?
When releasing electronic badge projects — both firmware and hardware designs — it's important to pick the right open-source license to protect your intentions while encouraging reuse and collaboration.
Here’s what we recommend:
📂 Firmware (Software Code)
For badge firmware (Arduino sketches, PlatformIO projects, etc.), the best open-source licenses are:
- MIT License
- Simple, permissive, and widely recognized.
- Allows others to reuse, modify, and redistribute your code as long as they include the original license and copyright.
-
Great for encouraging innovation with minimal restrictions.
-
Apache 2.0 License
- Also very permissive, but adds extra protection against patent claims.
-
A good choice if you want clear legal terms and you’re concerned about corporate or commercial use.
-
GPLv3 (General Public License)
- Strong copyleft license.
- Requires any derivative works to also be released as open source under GPL.
- Choose this if you want to ensure that any modified versions stay open source.
Badge Pirates Recommendation:
We typically use MIT License for firmware to maximize reuse and keep it simple for both individuals and commercial users.
🛠️ Hardware Files (Schematics, PCB Designs, 3D Models)
For hardware designs, the best open-source licenses are:
- CERN Open Hardware License (OHL) v2
- Specifically designed for hardware projects.
- Allows modification and redistribution under clear terms, similar to open-source software licenses.
-
Versions:
- CERN OHL-P (Permissive) — very open, like MIT.
- CERN OHL-W (Weakly Reciprocal) — modified hardware designs must be shared under the same license.
- CERN OHL-S (Strongly Reciprocal) — stricter, everything derived must stay open.
-
TAPR Open Hardware License
- An earlier hardware-specific license.
- A bit older, but still sometimes used in electronics communities.
Badge Pirates Recommendation:
We recommend using CERN OHL-P for hardware when you want to be friendly and encourage remixing, or CERN OHL-W if you want modified versions to remain open.
⚡ Quick Summary
Type | Best License(s) | Why |
---|---|---|
Firmware (Code) | MIT or Apache 2.0 | Simple, permissive, encourages reuse |
Hardware Files | CERN OHL-P or CERN OHL-W | Hardware-specific protections, remixable |
Pro Tip:
Always include a LICENSE
file in your GitHub repo or project folder, and clearly note the license choice inside your documentation and readme!